Interface Overview
The Claims Heads Factory is used to synthesise structured narrative arguments from material already established in the chronology and analysed in the claims matrix.
It is not a fact-finding tool and it does not determine legal outcomes.
The Analytical Triad
The platform operates on three distinct but interdependent artefacts:
- Chronology — what happened
- Claims Matrix — what law may be engaged
- Claims Heads — how facts and law are argued together
Preconditions
If a fact does not appear in the chronology, it does not belong here. If a legal provision has not been tested in the claims matrix, it must not be argued here.
Structure of a Claim Head
Each claim head is a bounded narrative unit consisting of:
- Identifier and title
- High-level narrative explanation
- Structured articulation of the legal theory
- Links to supporting chronology entries
- Links to relevant appendices (where applicable)
Use of Links
Claims Heads may contain links, but only in a controlled, downward direction.
- Links to chronology entries
- Links to evidence already in the bundle
- Links to appendices for contextual explanation
Claims Heads must not introduce new sources or create authority by citation density.
Risk of Misreading
Because Claims Heads read as structured argument, third parties may incorrectly treat them as findings, conclusions, or judicial-style determinations.
This risk cannot be eliminated by wording alone. It is mitigated only by strict discipline in how Claims Heads are written and presented.
Workflow
- Complete the chronology
- Complete the claims matrix
- Select a claim to synthesise
- Draft a bounded narrative explaining arguability
- Link downward to supporting material
- Review for overstatement
- Emit the claim heads document
How NOT to Use This Tool
Do NOT present Claims Heads as determinations
Claims Heads are not findings of fact, rulings, or judgments. They must never be represented as such.
Do NOT introduce new facts or law
All content must already exist in the chronology or claims matrix. This tool does not expand the evidential or legal universe.
Do NOT argue beyond what can be supported
If a proposition relies on inference, that must be explicit. If uncertainty exists, it must remain visible.
Do NOT let rhetoric outrun structure
Claims Heads are not advocacy pieces. If persuasive language replaces disciplined structure, the tool has been misused.